Response to the Logician: 070603: Part I of IV
Logician
May 16, 2007
Daniel. J. Shepard
The World Embracing Hope Foundation
Dear Sir
May I say, after reading some of your works and seeing the wonderful presentation I was able to download from your website, I was very impressed indeed with the logical method you have used in portraying a version of the truth.
Djs:
Interesting. I was unaware ‘truth’ had versions.
Logician
Your style is very refreshing and very similar to my own on many levels. It seems as if we have had quite a few things in common in our lives and our “paths” / “journeys” have now crossed. I have a feeling that we have crossed before but that is something else for another time.
Djs:
I would enjoy exploring this concept either on a private level or a public forum level.
Logician
In my life there are no coincidences only signs.
Djs:
Again we agree.
Logician
Your “universal philosophy” is quite brilliant and covers many of the unanswered questions few seem able to answer. There are many endearing qualities to it and even though you state in your first trilogy that you are not a scholar of merit, I beg to differ; you are without a doubt a very modest brilliant young man who has the very best of intentions at heart for the entire world’s population, a trait that very few possess.
You are so full of contradictions in your work it beggars belief. Rather harsh I admit but because you write about truths then I feel obliged to use my version of your works within the scope of my own truths. Please let me explain.
Djs:
And again we agree. Any pure ‘analysis’ is not ‘harsh’. Pure analysis is just that, pure analysis, and thus voids judgment.
Logician
In “You & I” page 252 you write “I want you to understand that I in no way would ever prejudge a suicide attempt; I would only feel a heavy heart from it. People have no right to make judgments about people who commit suicide,” but then you go on to write on page 254, “would only accentuate how ludicrous your action of suicide would be anyway.”
Djs:
You are correct. I have to admit, my emotions surfaced often in the first two books: You and I Together and In the Image of God.
Logician
If this is no prejudging then I don’t know what is.
Djs:
Again I agree.
Logician
I also know that anyone can take a very small portion of a text and then take it out of context as there are so many other things within the text that give reason for the statement, but when you are dealing with universal feelings of other souls then you have to be entirely neutral.
Djs:
Again I agree. I attempted to rise to this level in Stepping Up To the Creator and The War and Peace of a New Metaphysical Perception both of which can be viewed at www.panentheism.com.
Logician
If you state that you are not going to prejudge an action of a fellow soul you cannot then go into graphic detail of how a soul will suffer because of it. You never know if it was supposed to be the path of the soul to take.
Djs:
Correct.
To be continued:
Logician