View Article  How does Hinduism help us understand what life is? Part I of II

How does Hinduism help us understand what life is?

 

 

Part I of II

 

The Hindu concept of the existence of nine substances (the four atoms, and space, time, ether, mind, and soul) in the universe helps us understand that “life” is the soul.

 

 

Hinduism professes the idea that the universe is composed of nine substances.

 

It specifically separates the concept of body (composed of the four atoms and wrapped in space, time, and ether) from the mind and the mind from the soul.

 

This separation explains the essence of life.

 

This helps us understand that the body is just the body.

 

Life on the other hand is not the physical body, but rather the essence of the individual is the soul itself.

 

The mind, in turn, provides the means by which the soul is able to relate to the body’s experiences within the universe.

 

The mind provides awareness.

 

The mind provides the means by which the soul is capable of connecting to the body and conversely, the mind provides the means by which the body connects to the soul.

 

 

What about the universe itself?

 

To be continued: Part II of II: The universe...
View Article  Phenomenological modern day Western Ethics: Part I of II

Phenomenological modern day Western Ethics:

 

Princeton Professor Singer: And I repeat, I would kill Disabled Infants
LifeSiteNews | 9/12/06 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 09/12/2006 4:28:08 PM PDT by wagglebee

In a question and answer article published in the UK's Independent today, controversial Princeton University Professor Peter Singer repeats his notorious stand on the killing of disabled newborns.  Asked, "Would you kill a disabled baby?", Singer responded, "Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole."

… In fact, Singer himself uses the abortion debate to justify his murderous stance. 

… Singer rejects that man was created in the image and likeness of God. 

… Asked about the choice between killing 10 cows or a human, Singer said he would kill the cows, but not because they were of less value, but because humans would mourn the death more.

…"even though Singer does not like to be compared to the Nazi's especially since his parents died in the Holocaust, his philosophical position is identical to what the Nazi's proposed. 

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article1466409...

 

 

The above makes sense if and only if one embraces the model of reality as being simply a physical existence. Such a model rationalizes both Hitler and Singer in the same manner.

 

Singer is not illogical if phenomenology is the be all and end all.

 

Hitler is logical if we base ethics upon a model of reality wherein we exist within a location of physical existence and that is the end of it.

 

To be continued: Part II of II: Singer is not...