View Article  The secret can now be told: Man is divine in nature. Part III of III

The secret can now be told: Man is divine in nature.

 

Part III of III

 

The idea was simply: All men are divine in nature. The idea was not that the body, the physical nature of men was divine but rather that the essence of men, consciousness, was divine in nature.

 

God was omniscient thus omnipotent and omnipresent. God had knowing. The essence of God was consciousness.

 

God created man in Its image.

 

Man had knowing, consciousness. The essence of man was consciousness and thus was made in the image of God.

 

God was omnipotent. Thus man’s consciousness was a perfect image of God’s consciousness.

 

God is divine. Man is divine.

 

Man has ‘the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’.

 

All men being divine in nature meant no man is more equal than another, in short ‘all men are created equal’. No individual is more divine in nature than another and as such: All men are equal. A Pope is no more equal than an isolated atheist. A president is no more equal than a destitute pauper. A billionaire is no more equal than a common criminal.

 

Now the founders of America did not state man has the ‘right to happiness’ but rather stated all men have the ‘right to the pursuit of happiness’. There is a significant difference.

 

What rationality, other than that listed above, leads us to emphatically state, absolutely understand, unequivocally declare men are divine and as such have the God given ‘right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’?

 

The work located on the website, www.panentheism.com, clearly lays out the supporting details regarding the statement statement: Men are divine in nature. The work is free of all fees, royalties, and copy restrictions.

 

Having stated what it is secret societies have hidden for their self protection, let me state what it is such a statement, ‘Men are divine in nature’, means.

 

Men are divine in nature means:

 

No man, no being that is divine has the right to oppress another, has the right to use their freedom to take your freedom away from you.

 

When one divine being actively works to return freedom to a subjugated divine being they are actively reestablishing the very divine nature of God.

 

The very first categorical imperative, the first principle of a universal morality is to protect the right of the individual, the right of a divine entity, to travel unimpeded or in short: The first and foremost principle of ethics and morality is to free men, is to establish freedom.

 

The second categorical imperative, the second principle of a universal morality is to be free.

 

The absokutely pure pacifist ignores the first and embraces the second categorical imperative.

 

But why are the two categorical imperatives listed in the specific order given?

 

The order emerges as a result of the understanding that all men are divine and as such your essence is no more divine that another’s and having said that: There are six billion of them and only one of you.

 

 End

View Article  The secret can now be told: Man is divine in nature. Part III of III

The secret can now be told: Man is divine in nature.

 

Part III of III

 

The idea was simply: All men are divine in nature. The idea was not that the body, the physical nature of men was divine but rather that the essence of men, consciousness, was divine in nature.

 

God was omniscient thus omnipotent and omnipresent. God had knowing. The essence of God was consciousness.

 

God created man in Its image.

 

Man had knowing, consciousness. The essence man was consciousness and thus was made in the image of God.

 

God was omnipotent. Thus man’s consciousness was a perfect image of God’s consciousness.

 

God is divine. Man is divine.

 

Man has ‘the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’.

 

All men being divine in nature meant no man is more equal than another, in short ‘all men are created equal’. No individual is more divine in nature than another and as such: All men are equal. A Pope is no more equal than an isolated atheist. A president is no more equal than a destitute pauper. A billionaire is no more equal than a common criminal.

 

Now the founders of America did not state man has the ‘right to happiness’ but rather stated all men have the ‘right to the pursuit of happiness’. There is a significant difference.

 

What rationality, other than that listed above, leads us to emphatically state, absolutely understand, unequivocally declare men are divine and as such have the God given ‘right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness’?

 

The work located on the website, www.panentheism.com, clearly lays out the supporting details regarding the statement statement: Men are divine in nature. The work is free of all fees, royalties, and copy restrictions.

 

Having stated what it is secrete societies have hidden for their self protection, let me state what it is such a statement, ‘Men are divine in nature’, means.

 

Men are divine in nature means:

 

No man, no being that is divine has the right to oppress another, has the right to use their freedom to take your freedom away from you.

 

When one divine being actively works to return freedom to a subjugated divine being they are actively reestablishing the very divine nature of God.

 

The very first categorical imperative, the first principle of a universal morality is to protect the right of the individual, the right of a divine entity, to travel unimpeded or in short: The first and foremost principle of ethics and morality is to free men, is to establish freedom.

 

The second categorical imperative, the second principle of a universal morality is to be free.

 

The absokutely pure pacifist ignores the first and embraces the second categorical imperative.

 

But why are the two categorical imperatives listed in the specific order given?

The order emerges as a result of the understanding that all men are divine and as such your essence is no more divine that another’s and having said that: There are six billion of them and only one of you.

 

 End