View Article  What does topology have to offer us as individuals? Part II of II

What does topology have to offer us as individuals?

 

Part II of II

What if topology finds universal truths exist unaffected and undistorted by the forces of our universe?

 

Then topology would have discovered the existence of truths in the area that lies beyond our universe.

 

Topology would then become the first field of science or mathematics to do so.

 

But this wouldn’t make topology the first field of study to do so.

 

Religions have been discussing universal truths for thousands of years.

 

Mathematics, on the other hand, may well become the first field of study dealing with direct observation of the universe around us which is capable of proving truths which describe eternity.

Such an accomplishment would be the first step science or mathematics would have taken to reinforce the field of religion.

 

Hope of an eternal existence could become re-ignited by one of the least expected fields of study – theoretical mathematics.

 

 

‘Could become’ should actually read ‘has become.’

 

Topology does not need to actually find universal truths.

 

Just the fact that this field has evolved within the analytical areas of math and science should be enough of a statement to make us realize that even mathematics and science are now beginning to give some validity to the idea of eternity.

 

 

End

View Article  Dialogue with a Neo-Buddhist: Action versus inaction 0610 19m

Clyde G. is a respected thinker and Neo-Buddhist who has been acknowledged for his ability to ask questions going to the heart of issues regarding metaphysical models of reality. 

 

061009

 

Cg: How would your suggestion that “one is responsible for the actions one does not take”, given the above conclusion, effect your decision making?  To me (you may feel differently) it seems that such a consideration might cause me permanent indecision or, more likely, to ignore that suggestion and choose.

 

Djs: I would disagree with this point. We make decisions every day, every hour, every minute, every second regarding what actions we will or will not take. This scenario does not cause us to enter into a state of ‘permanent indecision’ although it does cause us to pause from time to time.

 

Cg: Yes, people make decisions every day, but that may be because people do not believe that “one is responsible for the actions one does not take”.

 

061017:

 

Djs: …or that may be because people do not believe that ‘…one is responsible for ‘actions they do take’ – namely determinists, or eternally responsible for ‘actions they do take’ (do not believe in an existence void time – timelessness) – namely phenomenologist), or responsible for ‘actions they do not take’ (do not believe that actions ‘freely not taken’ are not a form of action) – namely Buddhists?????

 

There are two forms of actions of free will:

 

Active action of free will: action freely taken, consciously chosen

 

Passive actions of free will: actions freely not taken, consciously ignored

 

One is responsible for all actions of free will, both active and passive

 

061018:  cg

 

Look at my initial paragraph at the top.  I wrote,

 

How would your suggestion that “one is responsible for the actions one does not take”, given the above conclusion, effect your decision making?  To me (you may feel differently) it seems that such a consideration might cause me permanent indecision or, more likely, to ignore that suggestion and choose.

 

And you responded that you disagreed!  What did you disagree with, that I think I might feel a certain way?  Can you tell me how I should feel?  Or what I should think?

 

And you did not answer my question, “How would your suggestion that “one is responsible for the actions one does not take”, given the above conclusion, effect your decision making?” (emphasis added)

 

 

 

061009 continued:

 

Cg: But even when considering only the consequences of the “potential actions of which we are aware”, those consequences will depend on the actions taken by everyone, excluding you, at that moment of your act and ALL the actions taken by everyone, including you, thereafter eternally.

 

061017

 

Djs: True but keep in mind that it is the individual who is responsible for the action of free will they personally initiate regardless of what actions others take.

 

061018:  cg

 

How will you disentangle the net of actions and their consequences?  Your actions (and non-actions) arise in a context that exists due to the actions of everyone who ever existed up to that moment and the consequences of your actions are intertwined with the actions and consequences of everyone, including you, thereafter eternally.