View Article  Short Story 2250 AD: Collapse into nothingness is worse than collapse into emptiness: Part I of VII

Collapse into nothingness is worse than collapse into emptiness

 

 

 

2250AD:
Emptiness or Nothingness

The Klein Bottle Reemerges
Collapse into nothingness is worse than collapse into emptiness

 

Collapse

 

Part I of VII

 

If we thought we were going to get out of the bottle before it collapsed, we were sadly mistaken. 2250 proves to be a very sober­ing year. We soon discover that our prison, the Klein bottle, is not eternal. We are about to discover there is a big difference between emptiness and noth­ingness. We are about to realize that our universe collapsing into nothingness may appear to be a threatening concept, but it may be far less traumatic than collapsing into emptiness.

 

Science and technology continue to inspire and amaze us. In fifty short years, we have developed technology capable of adjusting for the Klein bot­tle effect that had previously distorted our ability to find the boundary of the universe. The boundary is now fully mapped and we are beginning to dream of voyages to the far reaches of the galaxy. There appears to be no end to the borders of our influence, other than the far distant boundary of the universe itself.

 

The boundary of the universe is smooth as glass yet made of no appar­ent physical substance. It appears to be impenetrable by anything of which we are aware. The boundary is an apparent force field of some type that we cannot begin to comprehend, for it appears to defy all laws of physics. It turns away all energy or matter emissions we generate and project in its direction. The energy emissions we direct at it become redirected into the bottle in a perfectly predictable manner defined by the mathematics describ­ing behavior of matter and energy contained within a Klein bottle topology.

 

 

To be continued: Part II of VII: The Klein bottle appares to be an impenetrable...

View Article  Food for thought: Sex becomes personal as opposed to species preservation

Sex becomes personal as opposed to species preservation 

Have we reached the point in our development where we no longer need to regard sex as a form of species preservation mechanism?